PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Portfolios
Screeners
Discussions
COGT vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between COGT and ^GSPC is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

COGT vs. ^GSPC

Last updated May 30, 2025

Compare and contrast key facts about Cogent Biosciences, Inc. (COGT) and S&P 500 (^GSPC).

Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: COGT or ^GSPC.

Performance

COGT vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cogent Biosciences, Inc. (COGT) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

COGT:

-0.43

^GSPC:

0.62

Sortino Ratio

COGT:

-0.33

^GSPC:

0.94

Omega Ratio

COGT:

0.96

^GSPC:

1.14

Calmar Ratio

COGT:

-0.35

^GSPC:

0.61

Martin Ratio

COGT:

-1.02

^GSPC:

2.29

Ulcer Index

COGT:

32.42%

^GSPC:

5.01%

Daily Std Dev

COGT:

67.85%

^GSPC:

19.79%

Max Drawdown

COGT:

-98.09%

^GSPC:

-56.78%

Current Drawdown

COGT:

-91.79%

^GSPC:

-3.78%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COGT achieves a -29.36% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 0.52% return.

COGT

YTD

-29.36%

1M

9.76%

6M

-42.48%

1Y

-28.53%

3Y*

1.95%

5Y*

19.67%

10Y*

N/A

^GSPC

YTD

0.52%

1M

6.32%

6M

-1.44%

1Y

12.25%

3Y*

12.45%

5Y*

14.20%

10Y*

10.84%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Cogent Biosciences, Inc.

S&P 500

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

COGT vs. ^GSPC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
COGT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of COGT is 2626
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of COGT is 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of COGT is 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of COGT is 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of COGT is 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of COGT is 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
^GSPC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^GSPC is 6666
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

COGT vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cogent Biosciences, Inc. (COGT) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current COGT Sharpe Ratio is -0.43, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COGT and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Drawdowns

COGT vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COGT drawdown since its inception was -98.09%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COGT and ^GSPC.

Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

COGT vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Cogent Biosciences, Inc. (COGT) has a higher volatility of 28.09% compared to S&P 500 (^GSPC) at 4.76%. This indicates that COGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading data...